Skip to main content
MOSAIC

Country intelligence page

Iraq IRQ

Operation Iraq conflict at Admin 1. Every comparison below is confined to this operation, because operations differ in geographic scope, cadence and method and are not additive.

Present IDPs, latest round
1,031,475
Round 134, 31 Dec 2024
Baseline round
1,053,038
Round 133, 31 Aug 2024
Absolute changeMOSAIC-derived
-21,563
Difference in present IDPs between the two rounds
Displacement momentumMOSAIC-derived
-2.0%
Relatively stable
Assessment recency
612d
Latest report older than 365 days
Data confidenceMOSAIC-derived
75
high confidence in comparability, out of 100

What changed?MOSAIC-derived

Comparing round 134 (31 Dec 2024) with round 133 (31 Aug 2024) inside the Iraq conflict operation. Thresholds are MOSAIC monitoring settings, not IOM categories.

Areas at or above +5 per cent momentum

Areas in Iraq ranked by threshold crossings between the two most recent comparable DTM rounds
AreaLatestBaselineChangeMomentumComparabilityAnalysis
Al-Qadissiya112,7102,226+110,484+4963.3%Comparable
Wassit42,0784,134+37,944+917.9%Comparable
Baghdad211,02825,998+185,030+711.7%Comparable
Thi Qar6,3781,950+4,428+227.1%Comparable
Babil25,69815,966+9,732+61.0%Comparable
Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
31 Aug 2024 to 31 Dec 2024
Assessment round
Round 134 compared with round 133
Retrieved
2026-09-04T01:37:36.297Z
Calculation
Rows are summed to a present-IDP figure per area and round, then the latest round is compared with the preceding round of the same operation. Areas present in only one of the two rounds are reported as such and are never treated as zero.

Known limitations

  • An area that disappears between rounds may have ceased to be assessed rather than ceased to host displacement.
  • A newly reported area may be newly affected or newly assessed. The API does not distinguish between these.
  • Threshold bands are MOSAIC monitoring settings and are not calibrated to this country's assessment cadence.
Displacement Momentum is the proportional change in present IDP individuals between an administrative unit's latest comparable DTM assessment round and the preceding round within the same DTM operation. Bands are MOSAIC-defined monitoring thresholds, not IOM classifications. A momentum value is not computed where a baseline is missing or zero.

MOSAIC-derived indicator. Not an IOM classification.

National displacement timeline

Present IDPs by assessment round within the Iraq conflict operation. Breaks in the line mark non-consecutive round numbers, where an intervening round exists that this series does not include.

Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
2014-04-01 to 2024-12-31
Assessment round
Round 134
Retrieved
2026-09-04 01:37 UTC
Calculation
Present IDP figures are summed across all disaggregated source rows for each area, then across areas, for every round of the selected operation.

Known limitations

  • Figures may be estimates derived from key informants and secondary sources rather than exact enumeration.
  • Assessment coverage and cadence vary by country and operation, so cross-country comparison of change rates is not supported.
  • A change in a recorded figure may reflect population movement, altered assessment coverage, changed access, or enumeration method, and the API does not distinguish between these.
  • The public API exposes aggregated non-sensitive figures only, and does not carry the full detail of the underlying DTM datasets.

Admin 1 ranking, latest round

Areas ranked by present IDPs reported in the latest round. Bar length is proportional to the largest area.

  1. Ninewa221,911
    -0.6%
  2. Baghdad211,028
    +711.7%
  3. Erbil204,990
    -4.0%
  4. Al-Qadissiya112,710
    +4963.3%
  5. Kirkuk92,916
    +0.2%
  6. Wassit42,078
    +917.9%
  7. Diyala40,584
    -1.2%
  8. Al-Anbar33,120
    -0.5%
  9. Babil25,698
    +61.0%
  10. Al-Sulaymaniyah15,912
    -86.1%
  11. Kerbala9,876
    -0.7%
  12. Thi Qar6,378
    +227.1%
  13. Al-Basrah4,242
    -0.7%
  14. Salah Al-Din4,104
    -90.6%
  15. Al-Najaf2,166
    -68.0%
Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
31 Dec 2024
Assessment round
Round 134
Retrieved
2026-09-04 01:37 UTC
Calculation
Areas assessed in the latest round of this operation, ranked by summed present IDP individuals. Momentum shown alongside is the change from the preceding round.

Known limitations

  • Only areas assessed in the latest round appear. An unassessed area is absent, not zero.
  • Bar length encodes the reported figure only. It carries no information about area size, population or need.

MOSAIC-derived indicator. Not an IOM classification.

Anomaly signalsMOSAIC-derived

Areas whose latest figure moved unusually relative to their own recent history in this operation. Each signal names the rule that fired and the evidence behind it. A signal is a cue for collection, not a finding.

  • BaghdadSudden surge
    Latest
    211,028
    Baseline
    25,998
    Magnitude
    7.12
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    Latest round-to-round change is at or above +30 per cent and the absolute increase is at least 1,000 individuals. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • BaghdadDeviation from recent trend
    Latest
    211,028
    Baseline
    25,998
    Magnitude
    920.55
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    The latest change exceeds 3.0 times the median absolute change of the prior rounds in the comparison window, requiring at least four prior observations and a non-zero median. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • ErbilDeviation from recent trend
    Latest
    204,990
    Baseline
    213,493
    Magnitude
    9.29
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    The latest change exceeds 3.0 times the median absolute change of the prior rounds in the comparison window, requiring at least four prior observations and a non-zero median. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • Al-QadissiyaSudden surge
    Latest
    112,710
    Baseline
    2,226
    Magnitude
    49.63
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    Latest round-to-round change is at or above +30 per cent and the absolute increase is at least 1,000 individuals. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • Al-QadissiyaDeviation from recent trend
    Latest
    112,710
    Baseline
    2,226
    Magnitude
    944.31
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    The latest change exceeds 3.0 times the median absolute change of the prior rounds in the comparison window, requiring at least four prior observations and a non-zero median. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • WassitSudden surge
    Latest
    42,078
    Baseline
    4,134
    Magnitude
    9.18
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    Latest round-to-round change is at or above +30 per cent and the absolute increase is at least 1,000 individuals. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • WassitDeviation from recent trend
    Latest
    42,078
    Baseline
    4,134
    Magnitude
    1264.80
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    The latest change exceeds 3.0 times the median absolute change of the prior rounds in the comparison window, requiring at least four prior observations and a non-zero median. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • BabilSudden surge
    Latest
    25,698
    Baseline
    15,966
    Magnitude
    0.61
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    Latest round-to-round change is at or above +30 per cent and the absolute increase is at least 1,000 individuals. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • BabilDeviation from recent trend
    Latest
    25,698
    Baseline
    15,966
    Magnitude
    202.75
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    The latest change exceeds 3.0 times the median absolute change of the prior rounds in the comparison window, requiring at least four prior observations and a non-zero median. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • Al-SulaymaniyahAbrupt decrease
    Latest
    15,912
    Baseline
    114,684
    Magnitude
    -0.86
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    Latest round-to-round change is at or below -25 per cent and the absolute decrease is at least 1,000 individuals. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • Al-SulaymaniyahDeviation from recent trend
    Latest
    15,912
    Baseline
    114,684
    Magnitude
    50.90
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    The latest change exceeds 3.0 times the median absolute change of the prior rounds in the comparison window, requiring at least four prior observations and a non-zero median. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

  • Thi QarSudden surge
    Latest
    6,378
    Baseline
    1,950
    Magnitude
    2.27
    Basis
    82 obs, adequate

    Latest round-to-round change is at or above +30 per cent and the absolute increase is at least 1,000 individuals. Six or more observations available for the historical comparison.

Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
2014-04-01 to 2024-12-31
Assessment round
Round 134
Retrieved
2026-09-04 01:37 UTC
Calculation
Transparent statistical rules applied to each area's own trailing series within the operation. No model is fitted and no learned parameters are used.

Known limitations

  • An anomaly can be produced by a change in assessment coverage or method rather than by population movement.
  • Areas with short histories are flagged as low quality because normal variation cannot be characterised.
  • The public API supplies no adjacency graph, so no claim of spatial contiguity is made.

MOSAIC-derived indicator. Not an IOM classification.

Geographic concentrationMOSAIC-derived

Displacement is comparatively dispersed across 18 assessed units, with 61.8 per cent in the largest 3.

Largest areas by share of national present IDPs
AreaPresent IDPsShare
Ninewa221,91121.5%
Baghdad211,02820.5%
Erbil204,99019.9%

Normalised concentration index: 0.103 on a zero-to-one scale across 18 assessed areas.

Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
31 Dec 2024
Assessment round
Round 134
Retrieved
2026-09-04 01:37 UTC
Calculation
Concentration is computed over the administrative units reported in the selected round of the selected DTM operation. It uses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index of unit shares, normalised so that zero is an even distribution across assessed units and one is total concentration in a single unit. Units not assessed in the round are absent from the calculation, so a narrowing of assessment coverage will raise measured concentration without any population movement.

Known limitations

  • Concentration rises mechanically when assessment coverage narrows, with no population movement required.

MOSAIC-derived indicator. Not an IOM classification.

Coverage and confidenceMOSAIC-derived

What the observation process supports, stated separately from what the figures say.

Assessed areas, latest
18
Assessed areas, baseline
18
Rounds in operation
82
Median round interval
31 days
  • The most recent assessment in this operation is more than a year old. Treat every derived indicator as historical rather than current.

Confidence derivation

The change rests on two comparable consecutive rounds within one operation, with stable assessment coverage and a recent reporting date.

  • 25: Latest assessment is more than a year old
Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
2014-04-01 to 2024-12-31
Assessment round
Round 134
Retrieved
2026-09-04 01:37 UTC
Calculation
MOSAIC confidence describes how well a change is grounded in comparable DTM observations. It begins at 100 and applies fixed deductions for missing baselines, non-consecutive rounds, coverage changes, short unit histories and assessment age. It is a statement about data comparability and recency only. It carries no claim about the cause of a change.

Known limitations

  • Confidence describes data comparability and recency only. It carries no claim about the cause of a change.

MOSAIC-derived indicator. Not an IOM classification.

Recorded displacement reason, latest round

Taken directly from the DTM records. This is a source field, not a MOSAIC classification.

Present IDPs by recorded displacement reason
ReasonPresent IDPsShare
Conflict1,031,475100.0%
Methodology and provenance
Source
International Organization for Migration (IOM), Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM). Public API v3.
Endpoint
/v3/displacement/admin1
Geographic level
Admin 1
Operation
Iraq conflict
Reporting period
31 Dec 2024
Assessment round
Round 134
Retrieved
2026-09-04 01:37 UTC
Calculation
The displacementReason field on each source row, summed over the latest round of the selected operation.

Known limitations

  • Reason is recorded at assessment. It reflects the reason as reported, and may not capture compound or sequential causes.

Generate analyst brief

A deterministic, template-generated brief covering situation snapshot, key changes, trend, concentration, anomalies, analytic questions, information gaps, collection priorities and methodological caveats. No generative model is in the path, so the same data always produces the same brief.